the partially examined life best episodes reddit

"A philosophy podcast by some guys who at one point were set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. You don't have to know any philosophy or even have read the text we're talking about to follow and enjoy the discussion. On the novel 1984 (1949) and the essays “Politics and the English Language” (1946) and “Notes on Nationalism” (1945). We use cookies on our websites for a number of purposes, including analytics and performance, functionality and advertising. What are we trying to do here? Thus the sometimes self-immolating moves by Trump to overturn Obama-era policies. refraction) we are “really” just encountering a series of bent-sticky phenomena within consciousness, and hence make no mistake at all, Why should you bother to listen to us? The Partially Examined Life feels like it was created just for me! New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the partiallyexaminedlife community, Continue browsing in r/partiallyexaminedlife, "A philosophy podcast by some guys who at one point were set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it. Birthers felt that Obama, despite all his gifts and talents, should never be placed above a white man in the government hierarchy. I recently downloaded the podcast. To appeal to to these folks Trump has to know what makes them angry and use that anger to move policy decisions. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. It goes something like this (this is a rough paraphrase marred by my own forgetfulness): at a certain point in our life, we leave our provincial life behind and go to university, where we encounter a safe space to encounter radically different ideas. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. no comments yet. Source: Wikipedia But it goes further than that--those outcomes are the result of anger but not hatred. We get some context from the two essays: "Politics and the English Language" tells us that when we parrot metaphors and other phrases given to us ready-made by those in power (or anyone else), we cease to authentically think. We preferred the “partially examined life” to the examined life. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. I thought maybe it was the _Partially Examined Life_ (particularly episodes 192 and 193) that laid out this history, but it wasn't. The Partially Examined Life - Wikipedia . Thanks for the recommendations. I'm angry, which according to Aristotle is a reasonable reaction to my pain at being slighted by the election of a fool (editorializing: this is not subjective, he acts like a fool). Whatever, not an exact quote but close to the spirit of what he said. The writing of this article needs serious editing for clarity, including: when you use a metaphor, such as: consciousness is a container of objects of a special kind – phenomenal objects – when we believe we have seen a bent stick (cf. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. Over the years, we've on occasion gotten some bad reviews, so I . The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. And if you can't say it, you can't really think it either, so the "thought crime" that begins the protagonist's journey of despair would be impossible. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. We also feature episodes from other podcasts by our hosts to round out your partially examined life, including Pretty Much Pop (prettymuchpop.com, covering all media), Nakedly Examined Music (nakedlyexaminedmusic.com, deconstructing songs), and (sub)Text (subtextpodcast.com, looking deeply at lit and film). This is critical: "Life introduced revolutionary form of, a new form of physical causation into the universe" "We feel that even when all possible scientific questions have been answered, the problems of life remain completely untouched. The Partially Examined Life episodes 213 and 214 (forthcoming) ... Facebook Twitter Reddit Should Literature Be Political? The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? Given this extremity, could the depicted society possibly plot out a realistic trajectory from our current one, or even amount to a particularly illuminating thought experiment? ", Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. In 1984, citizens are expected to surrender their individuality to the party (i.e., the state), and the full foursome is here to talk about exactly how that's supposed to work in the story and who counts as a citizen ("outer party") vs. a prole (whom those in power starve of the means to revolt but don't bother to indoctrinate on an individual level). "Notes on Nationalism" describes the difference between patriotism, i.e., authentic pride in your locality, and nationalism, which should really be called factionalism, which involves putting all your efforts (à la Beauvoir's "serious man") in the service of country or party or whatever. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? Or is this just a thought experiment to show what kind of organization one would need to ensure continuous power? In Ethics of Ambiguity - 3. Sometimes after a Partially Examined Life episode, we join with listeners and maybe a scholar to see if we understand. 0 comments. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast and philosophy blog by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. share. The Antimonies of Action there is a quote that says, "we can understand the misanthrope who in 1939 declared: 'After all, when you look at people one by one, it doesn't seem so awful a thing to make war upon them."' I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. For more reviews, see comments to our About Us page. best. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. Also, people on the left felt a moral superiority over the confederate-flag-waving-Proud-to-be-an-American set to which Trump appeals. Sort by. save hide report. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. Learn about more network podcasts at partiallyexaminedlife.com. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. In 1984, Orwell presents us with a society where the ruling powers have mastered the art of retaining power, and one element of this involves "Newspeak," where the vocabulary is purposely limited to the point where subversive sentiments can't be expressed. I thought maybe it was the _Partially Examined Life_ (particularly episodes 192 and 193) that laid out this history, but it wasn't. ", Press J to jump to the feed. I skimmed a description of the other episodes, but I couldn't find it. Or was he engaging in satire, or just warning us of where certain tendencies of his day's socialism might lead if left unchecked? The most frequent participants are Mark Linsenmayer, Seth Paskin, Wes Alwan, and Dylan Casey. Go subscribe at partiallyexaminedlife.com! Anyway, I just wanted to write this out because I think it gave me an understanding of our political environment that I hadn't had before. Or is calling such things "Orwellian" really just a cliché of exactly the sort that Orwell himself would object to? I skimmed a description of the other episodes, but I couldn't find it. It is self described at the beginning of many episodes as "A philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living, but then thought better of it." How do I access the discord as I am now a $5 patron but I can't find how to get on the server from patreon. I'm struggling to work out why the word 'violence' would ever be extended to cover most, perhaps even all, forms of harm. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast and downloadable audio series about philosophy. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Thanks for the recommendations. Those are great episodes, but they're not quite the one I had in mind. Image by Solomon Gundry. We fulfill an often received request and dive deeper into the "science wars": https://partiallyexaminedlife.com/2019/11/25/ep230-1-latour/ Log in or sign up to leave a comment log in sign up. What's the relation between language and totalitarianism? You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion I recently downloaded the podcast. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. You don’t have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we’re talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. And I can see it from what we will call "both sides." I remember listening to a podcast a year or two ago, where they laid out a history of education. In July, the Partially Examined Life philosophy podcast discussed Sandel’s first (and most academically influential) book, 1982’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, in which he argued that society can’t be neutral with regard to claims about what the good life amounts to. I was curious what episodes this community would recommend I start with. The episodes are pretty self-contained, usually focusing on a single set of readings, it is a bit of a struggle to follow the terminology though, although that may just be me not paying enough attention. So, was this Orwell's version of Marx's theory of history, i.e., through some kind of Darwinism of ideas, factions that exhibit these kinds of defensive mechanisms will inevitably rise to the top (note that this happens to all three of the world's empires in the story, though each of them had different starting ideologies)? These guys have done Joe Tab. ‎The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on … What we see now is hatred playing out on the national stage. The Partially Examined Life is a philosophy podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. This put me in mind of not only our current racial problems, but it kind of explains to me white supremacy in the US and the birther movement. --! Because I know I don't think Trump supporters should control anything because their allegiance to a known grifter tells me they are either stupid or evil (hatred brings out evil). Does lying by our government in this way, or trying to restrict speech to only "acceptable" modes, or working up fear of an external, mostly illusory threat to keep the citizens in line… Do these measures represent a slippery slope to totalitarianism, to anything like the world that Orwell describes? And so we decided to create a philosophy podcast with discussions that were informed but not overly academic, less like a classroom lecture and more like a conversation over drinks after class, and unified by the question of what makes philosophy worthwhile. A Glimpse into Sartre by The Partially Examined Life in Literature, Philosophy, Podcasts | April 15th, 2019 Facebook Twitter Reddit. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Orwell has thankfully helped inoculate against disingenuous political speech, such as calling the Republicans' current plan "The American Health Care Act" when it is in fact designed to undermine care for many (I pick this example only for its recency; there are many others available of various partisan varieties). The most recent episode of the show is available to listen to. Where should I start to get a feel for what the podcast is like, the host personalities, and euphemism, etc., of the show? Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Each episode, we pick a text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. You don't have to know any philosophy, or even to have read the text we're talking about to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. Partially Examined Life Texts (103 books). 100% Upvoted. … (Note that he was a dedicated socialist himself.) Each episode, we pick a short text and chat about it with some balance between insight and flippancy. Thanks for the recommendations. representative I think of their general dislike for actual life and events. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. It was something like, "We are angry when we feel slighted, and we feel slighted when we think that the privilege we earned isn't recognized or someone we feel has lower status than us is place above us in some hierarchy." What Orwell describes is extreme: Purposefully and constantly revised history to reflect current party priorities, constant surveillance and even entrapment to "educate" citizens to love the state (which in the case of our protagonist breaks him to the point of his being essentially useless to the state's efforts), the necessity of "double-think" that involves citizens both purposely lying to themselves and then forgetting that they have done so, and finally, the overt avowal by the rulers (the "inner party") that they pursue power purely for power's sake, not for the sake of some good apart from power. The Partially Examined Life is a podcast by some guys who were at one point set on doing philosophy for a living but then thought better of it. That's why they were angry and did stuff like for the Tea Party and make statements like, "My job is to ensure he is a one-term president." "We feel that even when all possible scientific questions have been answered, the problems of life remain completely untouched. You don\'t have to know philosophy or read the text to (mostly) follow and (hopefully) enjoy the discussion. I don't know who's who on the show, I just listen, but when they are discussing the Rhetoric and Aristotle's comments on anger, the guy who I think is the "serious one" said something really great about anger that I took to point at our current situation on race in America. Now, they were angry at the election of Obama (above I show the fruits of the anger) but there was also something darker going on, they hated him and would do anything they could to ensure that he didn't exist in historical annals. I’m Mark Linsenmayer, the host of The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast, and I’d like to introduce you to a new-in-2016 interview series called Nakedly Examined Music (iTunes – Facebook – RSS) that features great songwriters talking about their motivations and techniques regarding specific songs.. Each episode we pick a text and chat about it with insight and flippancy. Those are great episodes, but they're not quite the one I had in mind.

Himala Movie Theme, Does The Dog Die In Them, Ideal World Watch Sales, Kevin Mitnick Movie Netflix, How Do Hackers Hack Your Computer, Re Scarisbrick Case Summary, Demi Lovato Songs,

Posted in Uncategorized.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *