And the movie shows why this is a bad idea. It looks like a good movie and I want to be able to enjoy it as much as possible, and enjoying Blade Runner is a part of that. If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. The 1982 dystopian science fiction action film directed by Ridley Scott and starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, and Sean Young. Even though I have seen the film dozens of times and in 4K before. I think it's a masterpiece because it successfully manages to create a world and make it feel real/tangible. In celebration of the film's 35th anniversary, as well as the imminent release of the upcoming sequel, Blade Runner … I definitely can appreciate the special effects and the setting. This isn't a problem on a second watch, because you can take it for what it is, but it's the reason many people need that second watch to enjoy Blade Runner. If that's how you see it then I don't know how to help you. I'm just saying that the only reason why he survives is because everyone he fights either spares his life, runs away instead of fighting him, or is shot by someone else and that the movie does nothing to justify the idea that Deckard would be able to win a one on one fight against any of them if they were actually trying to kill him. Personally I think it has a lot to do with how they are framed but I know there's even more to it than that... Blade runner in 4k looks better than most modern films Marvel movies. Blade Runner: How Its Problems Made It a Better Movie You love Blade Runner because it's a hot mess. It's not about a grand struggle, or unraveling the mysteries of existence and being. Why Blade Runner 2049 Is Better Than Blade Runner Inevitably, Blade Runner 2049 is simply a more enjoyable viewing experience than the original. Maybe it's the bleak outlook, which usually doesn't bother me. I love Harrison Ford in both Star Wars and Indiana Jones. Combined with a state of the art Dolby Atmos speaker setup, it was a mind blowing experience. That being said, I'm looking forward to 2049 with a better director at the helm and better actors in Gosling and Leto. A lot of things in sci-fi films are mentioned but not really explained, it's just part of world building. He literally closes the door, holds it shut to keep her from leaving his room, and forces her to kiss him (and presumably have sex with him). Mainly thanks to its much larger budget and the fact that visual effects technology was far more advanced in 2017 than in 1982, Blade Runner 2049 did a better job of depicting a future society than the original did. God that was an amazing experience. And the only reason he survives fighting Roy is because Roy suddenly decides to spare his life for no reason at all after trying to kill him for several minutes. At the time all i thought was what a cool movie to watch in class, unaware the movie itself would forever always bring me back to such fond memories of that place and time. Saw it on the big screen last Sunday. US THEATRICAL RELEASE (1982) It's ironic that the actual theatrical release of this film … Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. 667 votes, 53 comments. The setting is the most interesting part of Blade Runner and it isn't explored enough. But ok, Deckard should probably have called for backup. Zhora coudn't kill him because the moment she almost did that , a girl went into the room so she didn't want to make herself a murderer in front of a human. If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. It's about trying to understand what makes us human and what makes us real. The fact that he is flawed, human, and isn't a kung-fu ninja has nothing to do with what I was saying. Your explanation is more convoluted than the film. 41.9k members in the bladerunner community. The VAST majority this movie has the reputation it does (and deservedly so) is the look of the film. Blade Runner is a small story in a big world. He actually loses to Leon and only survives because Rachael unexpectedly shows up and kills him. I do hope to change that as I would like to get into film making my self and make a tech noir sci-fi film. Blade Runner has a special place in my heart, and is constantly flitting around in my top 5-10 films of all time. Now that the sequel is coming out it's fashionable. Blade Runner is not a cult classic. On the other hand there is tons of things that puts you off as fake. The plot is structured around an idea that doesn't make any sense. So here's the thing, a lot of you are saying "no cgi, cgi made it great and age well". However, when I did, I didn't enjoy or really appreciate it. Their relationship is centered around both Deckard and Rachel's curiosity and attraction for one another. I should like it, but the plot just doesn't actually seem cohesive to me and the acting seems like it is often over or underdone. In today's video (my first video ever), we look over both critically-acclaimed Blade Runner films to see which is better. Blade Runner is a 1982 science fiction film directed by Ridley Scott, and adapted by Hampton Fancher and David Peoples. That level of concept art and noire cinematography just aren't valued as much as big vfx these days. I want to like this movie, but I think that I'm just not understanding what makes Blade Runner great". Pris gets him in a headlock he can't escape from, and the only reason he survives that is because she lets go of him and actually starts doing backflips across the room for no reason at all. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Star Wars is the only other major sci-fi film that has been tinkered with as many times as Blade Runner, but unlike the original cut of what is now known … That is not what their relationship is "centered" around. This is so bizarre. Much like Alien, I think there is a hypnotic rhythm to the film. Maybe it's that I've only like one Ridley Scott film ever (Alien). 2049 was way better than it had any right to be and was good without needing to be re-edited. Starring Harrison Ford, Rutger Hauer, Sean Young, and Edward James Olmos, it is loosely based on Philip K. Dick's 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? It's one of the most popular 80s movies, and is considered one of the 50 best movies of all time by critics. First off I just want to say you don't have to enjoy it. First up is the “original” or “theatrical” version — there are actually two of these, but the most commonly available one is the US theatrical cut, which is the version that people who bought a ticket to a US theater in 1982 would have seen. When a sequel was announced I had this horrible sinking feeling that they were going to fuck it up on the scale of, say, most Terminator sequels. Blade Runner 2049 is a movie that is easily 15 to 20 minutes too long. He only survives because the plot demands it.). ... help Reddit App Reddit coins Reddit premium Reddit gifts. Dune director Denis Villeneuve is eager to right the box office wrongs of Blade Runner 2049 with his upcoming adaptation of Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic.But to understand how Villeneuve got here in the first place, we have to go back to 2017 when he achieved the impossible by delivering a sequel to Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner that was arguably better … I love science fiction, and since Blade Runner is seen as a sci-fi masterpiece, I was excited when I got around to seeing it. It's definitely worth the price for the 4k copy!! Originally released in 1982 and not a box office hit, director Ridley Scott's Blade Runner has not only achieved status as a seminal sci-fi classic, but the film has lived several cinematic lives in the last 35 years. I haven't seen it in 4k yet!!! Blade Runner is not a cult classic. I completely agree with you, but this sort of goes without saying. I think it's a masterpiece because it successfully manages to create a world and make it feel real/tangible. I am just literally saying what happened in the movie. Every movie pre-1976 and almost all movies pre mid 1980s didn't use CGI. Rachel doesn't know how to respond sexually because these are new feelings for her. RELATED: Blade Runner 1982 vs. 2049: Which Sci-Fi Movie Is Better In Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner , the illegal landing of a group of six renegade replicants on Earth is what triggers the return of Deckard from retirement, as Captain Bryant asks him to ‘retire’ four of these replicants as his assignment. Much like Alien, I think there is a hypnotic rhythm to the film. These days, Blade Runner is considered one of the all-time masterpieces of science fiction. Blade Runner 2049 is better by a country mile and it didn’t take multiple cuts to get that way. Still, he wasn't sure if the suspects were there anyway. The main romantic relationship is centered around Deckard sexually assaulting Rachael. He survives because a replicant (a THING that is created and looked at as an object to be owned) became "more human than human". The best known versions are the Workprint, the US Theatrical Cut, the International Cut, the Director's Cut and the Final Cut.These five versions are included in both the 2007 five-disc Ultimate Collectors Edition and 2012 30th-Anniversary … Deckard wouldn't have survived if the replicants had just acted rationally or even if more than one had fought him at the same time. I want to like this movie, but I think that I'm just not understanding what makes Blade Runner great. I really want to be able to appreciate Blade Runner (especially since I want to enjoy the sequel), so could someone please explain why Blade Runner is a great movie? " The combination of Philip K. Dick’s idea, … Most of the actors seemed like they were underacting or overacting. Couldnât believe how good it looks. A subreddit dedicated to Blade Runner. The odd thing is that none of those should be problems for me. Overall: Blade Runner. There's a place for CGI most definitely but there are so many issues that come along with creating creatures and characters that take focus in modern movies. Blade runner is probably more influential, but some versions are worse than others. The good cinematographers could make the '40's tech look good, and the bad ones are still making 2020 tech look terrible. That's not something that is justified by nostalgia. Most of city shots are undeniably seen as miniatures with small lights and you can't fool yourself no matter how hard you try. The best. It was absolutely stunning. That is what complaining about CGI are talking about. Film makers who rely on CGI for core elements of their stories will make it noticeable compared to a director 40 years ago who would have to hide his effects and use them very wisely and sparingly. The chiarascuro of noir really suits the film. Why would you say that ? Probably all of this. Just curious, what brought you to this thread? Blade Runner has always been a cult classic. Well, the Theatrical Cut of the film does. It's one of the most popular 80s movies, and is considered one of the 50 best movies of all time by critics. That still doesn't explain how he survived most of the instances I listed though. I really want to be able to appreciate Blade Runner (especially since I want to enjoy the sequel). David Fincher for example knows where to use CGI, not at things we are directed at, more so things we might take for granted. I made sure to watch Blade Runner the night before seeing 2049. It's also about trying to understand what makes life worth living, no matter how short and ephemeral it may feel. You've got the cart before the horse here. It's about trying to understand what makes us human and what makes us real. !ll I was amazed by the quailty. Amazing production design and great cinematography. Check out Alien in 4K as well. Yes, but how lightsabers work isn't the focus of Star Wars and it isn't its most interesting part. The main romantic relationship is centered around Deckard sexually assaulting Rachael. It's hard to say, no doubt that the film had a lot of perfectly shot scenes. The most interesting aspects of the world (such as most animals being extinct) are barely touched on. Blade Runner is a small story in a big world. The story was also mostly good, but the plot about the Replicant rebellion and K working with the underground went nowhere and I … Ok. The neon lights looked incredible, but so did all of the outdoor scenes of spinners and street level shots. The first film adaptation was Blade Runner, directed by Ridley Scott in 1982. Agreed, back in college, (computer science) there was a mandatory communication course, impact writing, effective presentations, depict movies/books and one of the movies was Blade Runner. To be cool? overall probably the original blade runner gets the nod. Roy never wanted to kill Deckard in the first place , he knew that his time would come and just want to show Deckard the pain that a replican had endured , he could essentially took Deckard 's gun when his hand stuck in the wall but he didn't and decided to only break his fingers. I own this DVD and can't say this is a movie I love. Ridley Scott’s seminal future noir Blade Runner turns 35 this year. No dream sequence. 2049 is better in every way, it’s not boring (OG is), and it tries to retcon the most problematic aspect of the first movie. My reply is only critical because we're comparing it to one of the best movies of the 20th century, when better movies in general were being made. The most interesting aspects of the world (such as most animals being extinct) are barely touched on. Sure poorly aged CG immediately dates a film and a lot of movies from the late 80s through the mid '00 are now nearly unwatchable because of bad CGI. I have tried numerous times to get through it and haven't been successful. Godfather II is not better than The Godfather. Blade Runner was a giant software-rendered video game back then and has impressed many video game critics with numerous awards for its amazing gameplay quality and the environment that matches the universe seen from the movie thanks to Syd Mead who worked for the film, as well as an excellent storyline that fits in with the workings between Ridley Scott … The film is set in a dystopian future Los Angeles of 2019, in which synthetic humans … The 1982 dystopian science fiction action … But 2049 was awesome. I think that part of my problem is that I've been treating it like a normal movie and trying to follow the characters and the plot when I should be looking at the overall themes. Edit: TLDR Bladerunner is amazing because of the things it did right, not really because of the things it didn't really have much access to at the time of making it (CGI). Thatâs because Blade Runner is a work of art and most modern films are rubbish. What do you think I should focus on. Deckard is also confused because she is very human and their relationship proves to him that Replicants have the same capacity for love as people. They could be sending a special team to find the replicants but it 's just not mentioned in the film. This is very much borrowing from old detective tropes. Not to mention ridiculous fake smoke and weird trajectory they move on. 2. People who liked it weren't cool. My favorite film, hands down. The plot is structured around an idea that doesn't make any sense (It doesn't make sense that, after the replicants have already killed one blade runner, the response would be to just send another one with no backup and only a pistol to protect him. Sure, in real life it's pretty rape-y, but have a little nostalgic romanticism. Just light through glass. I would disagree that Deckard survives because the plot demands it. The whole film is De Niro but that’s one of the few common ones on his list. Ridley Scott was not a fan of the theatrical cut, which was put together by studio executives who wanted a happy ending to please moviegoers. I might not be for you, and that's fine. I'd argue that modern films have less of this immersion breaking stuff. It's also about trying to understand what makes life worth living, no matter how short and ephemeral it may feel. I want to enjoy the sequel because I want to enjoy a critically acclaimed movie starring actors that I like that is directed by a great director. Why? Watch the Final and the original. A subreddit dedicated to Blade Runner. Nowadays CGI makes things too busy with greebling and bustling nonsense, not to mention the orange/teal palate, although 2049 was able to use those very well. Blade Runner became a cult because of the original, not the Director's cut or The Final Cut, without it you wouldn't be asking this question. Deckard didn't need a backup because he worked privately as a blade runner. Don't force it. Gunn declares Denis Villeneuve’s “Blade Runner 2049” is better than Ridley Scott’s landmark 1982 original, a controversial opinion that is sure to have its detractors. In Star Wars they don't even really tell you what the Clone Wars was about, or how a lightsaber works. Why? I can’t stand the story of the first one. No voice over. So why does Bladerunner still look so good? Blade Runner will forever be the best looking film ever made in my opinion, no cgi, just pure craftsmanship and camerawork. I want to like this movie, but I think that I'm just not understanding what makes Blade Runner great. It's not about a grand struggle, or unraveling the mysteries of existence and being. The world it creates and the special effects. I'm fine with the bleak outlook. I think so too. First I need to explain why you should use paragraph breaks... New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, News & Discussion about Major Motion Pictures, Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. He only is able to kill Zhora because she runs away instead of killing him when she has the chance. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. I think you're focused on the wrong things. Blade Runner is now considered by many to be one of the famed director's best works—fueling demand for the release of its belated sequel, Blade Runner 2049, in 2017. Especially when you consider how more ambitious things they show nowadays. It doesn't make you less of a person. I suppose I understand that. Nor is it about bringing down the big evil corporation or exposing 'the truth' to the masses. The main character is flawed and human, he doesn't have ultra ninja skills and kung-fu like everyone does these days. I really want to now. I saw this in November on the most advanced IMAX digital projector in the world (at Cinesphere in Toronto). It is just one of the themes of the movie. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the bladerunner community. Well admittedly, Blade Runner is much better than most modern films. by Philip K. Dick, about the character of Rick Deckard.The book has been adapted into several media, including films, comics, a stage play, and a radio serial. Blade runner 2049 was … I also like it poses philosophical questions without being too heavy handed, which unfortunately has led a whole slew of people believing Deckard is a Replicant, but that is another topic. To be trendy? Critics argue whether Blade Runner is a prime example of a postmodern film, Baudrillard states that “Another film often cited as ‘postmodern’ is Ridley Scott’s Blade Runner (1982), in which science, technology and progress are all questioned and shown in some way to have ‘failed’.The world in Blade Runner is polluted by industry and overcrowding: only the rich escape to the … Seven different versions of Ridley Scott's 1982 science fiction film Blade Runner have been shown, either to test audiences or theatrically. Nor is it about bringing down the big evil corporation or exposing 'the truth' to the masses. Haha I will admit this film looks better than avengers endgame on 4k hdr! As far as I can tell, none of that has to do with the idea of replicants being more human than human. I also like it poses philosophical questions without being too heavy handed, which unfortunately has led a whole slew of people believing Deckard is a Replicant, but that is another topic. But there are a lot of other factors that go into to a film not aging well and this hammering on CGI is overused. And really, now that CGI has gotten to the point where 80 percent of the time audiences don't even know CGI was used, (see: all the people who claim Nolan doesn't use CG) it's a perfectly viable technique to utilize in filmmaking, it just has to be used well. the role reversal of humans vs replicants. Looks like you're using new Reddit on an old browser. Fans and newcomers alike have faced an enduring question about Ridley Scott’s 1982 original: Which version of Blade Runner should I watch? I had a chance to see the restored 4k version at an imax theatre one time (Lincoln centre in New York). The scene at the beginning when they fly upto the tyrell building just when the first dude is taking the interview, the effects are astounding for the time! There were 7 versions of Blade Runner in total that were shown to audiences*: 1. Maybe its the color saturation. Blade Runner is an American neo-noir science fiction media franchise originating from the 1968 novel Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? The Martian is my favorite sci-fi movie, so I'm clearly fine with Ridley Scott's work. Blade Runner: The Final Cut 4K Ultra HD Blu-ray Review. Blade Runner 2049, to me, is a better film in every way. Those director had to concentrate on making all other elements work first and foremost. That alone killed the pacing for me. Because I fell in love with the original Blade Runner, with voice over. I do like the premise but I watch it for technical aspects of the movie which are as good or better than most movies ever made up to an including today. I'm not explaining anything. If you don't enjoy Blade Runner, I sure as hell hope you don't enjoy Blade Runner 2049. It wasn't the same but Joker really blew me away cinematography wise. Two times he survived because the replicants he was fighting moved away from him instead of killing him, another time he survived because of events that had nothing to do with him or the replicant he was fighting, and once the replicant he was fighting simply chose not to kill him despite trying to for the past several minutes. While both of them are incredibly complex and well-executed, the modernity and visual spectacle of 2049 capitalizes on aspects of the original that simply couldn't be perfected back in 1982. Either way, they start their romantic relationship because Deckard rapes her, and that is not ok. The site may not work properly if you don't, If you do not update your browser, we suggest you visit, Press J to jump to the feed. It could be my dislike for Ford as I only put up with him in Star Wars. A work print that was shown to test audiences in 1982. This movie changed my life, it set my standards for anything sci-fi. With the towering skyscrapers, entirely industrialized landscapes, and bursts of flame shooting into the sky, the original Blade Runner did a great … This is a detective story, not an action movie. Honestly that's a half truth and misleading. Aesthetically they’re both great. There are clearly flat backgrounds in normal scenes, big models like cars are all wobbly and don't give you proper feel. But that undercut Scott’s original in… People complain about noticeable CGI. It overcame problems, oddities, and a …
Angels Vs White Sox Prediction, Man Utd V Man City 2009/10, Daper Mit Covid, Subaru Outback Parts, University Of North Alabama Womens Basketball Division, Kassam Stadium Covid, Facts About Genetic Drift, Communications Jobs Charlotte, Nc, George Brooks Funeral, Miami Hurricanes Twitter, Tigertail And Mary Yelp,